Concludes that there was no effect over placebo. (March 2005)

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (November 2003)

In dermatology, homeopathy is often used in atopic dermatitis, other forms of eczema, psoriasis, and many other conditions. To date, however, there is no convincing evidence for a therapeutic effect. Dermatologic Therapy (June 2003)

This study demonstrated that homeopathic A. nitricum 12X does not reduce test anxiety in a general population of university students. Complement. Ther. Med. (June 2003)

This study provides no evidence that adjunctive homeopathic remedies, as prescribed by experienced homeopathic practitioners, are superior to placebo in improving the quality of life of children with mild to moderate asthma in addition to conventional treatment in primary care. Thorax (April 2003)

Concludes that this systematic review did not provide clear evidence that the phenomenon of homeopathic aggravations exists. Homeopathy (April 2003)

The effect of homeopathic treatment on mental symptoms of patients with generalized anxiety disorder did not differ from that of placebo. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (March 2003)

The results of this trial do not suggest that homeopathic arnica has an advantage over placebo in reducing postoperative pain, bruising and swelling in patients undergoing elective hand surgery. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (2003)

Best clinical evidence for homeopathy available to date does not warrant positive recommendations for its use in clinical practice. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (December 2002)

Concludes that, as a result of the recent scientific research on homeopathy, ample evidence exists to show that homeopathic therapy is not scientifically justifiable. Almeida, R. M., Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (October 2002)

The results, wholly negative, add to doubts whether dowsing in this context can yield objective information. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (April 2002)

This bulletin summarises the research evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy. It concludes: "There is currently insufficient evidence of effectiveness either to recommend homeopathy as a treatment for any specific condition, or to warrant significant changes in the current provision of homeopathy." NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2002) [pdf]

Concludes that there is no indication that belladonna 30CH produces symptoms different from placebo or from no intervention. Journal of Psychosomatic Research (March 2001)

Concludes that the trial data available to date do not suggest that homeopathy is effective in the prophylaxis of migraine or headache beyond a placebo effect. E. Ernst, Journal of Pain Symptom Management (November 1999)

Concludes that homeopathic Arnica 30x is ineffective for muscle soreness following long-distance running. Clinical Journal of Pain (September 1998)

The claim that homeopathic arnica is efficacious beyond a placebo effect is not supported by rigorous clinical trials. Archives of Surgery (1998)

"There is nothing to suggest that homeopathic drugs are any more effective than a placebo." Prescrire Int. (1998)

"It is concluded that these new publications cast considerable doubt on the efficacy of homoeopathy." E. Ernst, Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies [FACT] (1998)

Concludes that no significant difference between the two groups could be demonstrated. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (1997)

Concludes that there was no apparent difference between the effects of homoeopathic therapy and placebo in children with common warts under the conditions of this study. Dermatology (1996)